I recently saw the article, Militarization of Local Police Isn’t Making Anyone Safer, pop up on Digg and it pissed me off.  For about two years Digg has been curating popular news articles on the Internet.  One problem, they only tend to curate law enforcement related article that are markedly anti-police.  The above article being the most recent.

Let’s look into the claim made by the article’s title, but first a little history.  Line of Duty deaths in US law enforcement steadily increased since they were first recorded in the late-1700s.  This should be expected since so did the overall US population.  It stayed steady until 1970 when the US witnessed double digit increases in murdered police officers, which peaked with 284 in 1974 (310 were killed in 1930 during Prohibition but those numbers declined with its end).  In 1971 larger police agencies began providing groups of officers Special Weapons and trained the officers to use them, thus Special Weapons and Tactic (SWAT) teams were born.  By 1974, the Los Angeles Police Department had a full-time SWAT team and it is generally thought that year was the year the idea went mainstream.  Throughout the 1970s the SWAT team idea spread across US police agencies.

These first teams implemented two items which are common place today but were new at the time and today would be considered “militarizing”.  The first was the deployment of heavy weapons like fully auto assault rifles, armored vehicles and grenade launchers, as these were in ample supple at the end of the Vietnam War.  The second, and more ground-breaking was kevlar.  For the first time officers were wearing a device that helped protect vital organ from bullets when the DuPont company perfected it between 1970 and 1976.

Two things happened starting in 1975. One, fewer and fewer police were being killed even though overall police assaults and gun violence targeting officers was increasing.  Two, per capita, police were shooting fewer citizens.

Stats pulled from DOJ records, 1976 -2012.

The trend of decreasing crime and fewer police killed each year is extremely complex.    You can read one general study done by the University of Ohio on this topic titled, Trends in Killings of and by Police Officers.  But it has to be noted that in most discussions about the topic, from historians to researchers to  actual police officers, includes mention o of new equipment and tactics, which really started with the creations of the first SWAT team in the early-1970s, as one factor for where we are today.

The study this is all based on can be found here.  In it, Jonathan Mummolo does make the assertion that even the police are not any safer with the deployment of SWAT teams.  He writes, “In sum, estimated effects are generally positive and often indistinguishable from zero, and there is no evidence that acquiring a SWAT team lowers crime or promotes officer safety.”  But let’s look at what his study measures.  It measures the correlation between an agency obtaining and deploying a SWAT team to the OVERALL officer safety at that agency.  In order words, operating a SWAT teams did not seem to make it safer for the average patrol officer.  What one would really need to look at to make the claim that SWAT does not have a bearing on officer safety are agencies that lack SWAT teams or incidents when a SWAT team could not be deployed for various reason and your average patrol officer was tasked with high-risk enforcement actions.  This is hard since most agencies have SWAT teams and if they do not, one is usually deployed from an assisting agency.

From my experience over 20 years in law enforcement here is when and how SWAT does enhance officer safety.  After the patrol officer is shot and the suspect flees, later barricading himself in his residence.  When that suspect has to be extricated by force from the residence, the deployment of a team with Special Weapons and Tactics means that lesser trained, more poorly equipped patrol officers don’t have to do it.  It means when a drug house, guarded by a Mexican drug cartel, has to be raided during a warrant, the officers tasked to do it are afforded only best protection, equipment and training.

The deployment of a armored BearCat to transport officers to the door of the residence takes the place of an patrol car in which only a windshield provides protection.  A drone or robot can be used to not only locate the suspect within the house, and also to ensure no innocent bystanders are inside like kids.  When it is time for entry, shaped explosives quickly remove doors so that multiple officers don’t have to stand with “the fatal funnel” for seconds or minutes trying to kick it down.  Smoke and flashbangs are used to disorient the suspect, making it more difficult to return accurate fire at officers.  If deadly force is required, high powered rifles eliminate concerns if the suspect has body armor on, while at the same time provide more accurate fire, ensuring innocents are not hurt.  Finally, a well-trained entry team with a coordinated building clearing pattern help to minimize the chances that any officer will be injured by unknown suspects waiting in ambush.

By virtue of the fact that a group of lightly armed and modestly protected patrol officers aren’t tasked with conducting high-risk entries and search warrants, the additions of SWAT teams increase overall officer safety.  It is why the military employees special warfare groups like the US Navy SEALs and Delta when conducting operations involving high-risk/high-reward targets and usually will not task a standard infantry platoon, full of 19-year-old enlisted guys, to tackle it.

Take the politics out of it.  This all seems like common sense, even to most 10-year-olds out there playing video games, who ensure they supply their avatar with the best rifle and body armor before playing a round of Call of Duty.

So, the assertion that the “militarization” of the police hasn’t helped “anyone” is dubious at best, unless of course “anyone” is only meant to include lower income/high crime communities that tend to skew more African-American.  If by “anyone”, you also include the police, the title of the article is incorrect.


  1. It is perfect time to make a few plans for the longer term and it is time to be happy.
    I have learn this submit and if I may I want to recommend you some interesting
    things or tips. Maybe you could write subsequent articles relating
    to this article. I want to learn even more issues approximately it!

  2. I’ll right away grab your rss as I can’t to find
    your email subscription hyperlink or e-newsletter service.

    Do you have any? Kindly permit me realize so that I
    could subscribe. Thanks.

  3. I just couldn’t depart your web site prior to suggesting that I really loved the usual info a person provide on your visitors? Is gonna be again ceaselessly to investigate cross-check new posts.

  4. I will right away seize your rss feed as I
    can not to find your e-mail subscription hyperlink or newsletter service.
    Do you’ve any? Please let me recognize so that I may just subscribe.


  5. It’s perfect time to make a few plans for the future and it’s time to be happy.
    I have read this submit and if I may I wish to recommend
    you few interesting things or suggestions.

    Maybe you can write next articles regarding this article.
    I wish to learn more things approximately it!

  6. It’s appropriate time to make some plans for the long
    run and it’s time to be happy. I have learn this publish and if I may just I want to suggest you
    some attention-grabbing things or advice. Perhaps you can write next
    articles referring to this article. I wish to learn even more things about it!

  7. Hi, I do believe this is an excellent web site.
    I stumbledupon it 😉 I am going to revisit once again since i have book-marked it.

    Money and freedom is the best way to change, may
    you be rich and continue to guide other people.

  8. I’ll right away snatch your rss feed as I can not find your e-mail subscription hyperlink or e-newsletter service.

    Do you’ve any? Kindly allow me know so
    that I could subscribe. Thanks.

  9. It’s perfect time to make some plans for the future and it’s time to be happy.
    I’ve read this post and if I could I desire to suggest you some interesting things or suggestions.
    Maybe you can write next articles referring to this article.
    I wish to read even more things about it!

  10. I’ve been browsing online more than 3 hours lately, yet
    I by no means found any attention-grabbing article like yours.
    It’s beautiful value sufficient for me. In my view, if all webmasters and bloggers made good content material as you did,
    the net shall be a lot more helpful than ever before.

  11. It is the best time to make some plans for the future and it’s time to be happy.
    I have read this post and if I could I want to suggest you
    some interesting things or suggestions. Perhaps you can write next articles referring to
    this article. I wish to read more things about it!

  12. This design is spectacular! You obviously know how to keep a reader amused.
    Between your wit and your videos, I was almost moved to start my own blog (well, almost…HaHa!) Fantastic job.
    I really enjoyed what you had to say, and more than that, how
    you presented it. Too cool!


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here